Carbon credits are everywhere – from airline checkout screens to corporate sustainability reports.

But what if this well-intended system is giving us a false sense of progress?

At Ecodrive, we’ve taken a close look at how the voluntary carbon market works — and after careful thought, we’ve chosen not to invest in it.

Here’s why.

‍

First: The promise of carbon credits is appealing.

In theory, they offer a simple exchange: emit carbon here, offset it elsewhere.

They’ve helped fund renewable energy projects, forest conservation, and community-based land stewardship. They’ve even inspired early conversations around climate responsibility for many businesses.

We recognize and appreciate that.

But…

Carbon credits, as they exist today, are not living up to their promise.

And the stakes are too high to settle for solutions that sound good but fall short in practice.

‍

Here’s what we’ve found:

‍

1. Avoidance ≠ Removal

Protecting a forest is important — but it doesn’t remove carbon that’s already in the atmosphere. It just prevents more from being added.

This distinction matters.

Real climate progress depends on carbon removal, not just delay.

But because avoidance credits are significantly cheaper (as low as $3–$5/ton) than genuine removal ($100–$500/ton), they dominate the market. This creates a misleading sense of progress and leaves high-impact solutions underfunded.

‍

2. Verification is Often Unreliable

Even when real removal happens — like through tree planting or soil carbon capture — verifying it takes time, scientific rigor, and ongoing monitoring.

Without strong standards and third-party oversight, there’s no guarantee that carbon was actually removed — or that it will stay removed.

That lack of certainty undermines the very purpose of a carbon credit.

‍

3. Not All Carbon Storage is Permanent

Carbon stored in trees can be released in a wildfire. Soil carbon can be disturbed by farming. Projects can be reversed, changed, or even abandoned.

Meanwhile, engineered removal — like direct air capture — offers more durability, but isn’t differentiated clearly in the market.

Without a consistent framework, carbon accounting becomes murky, and the climate math doesn’t add up.

‍

4. Future Offset Delays Urgent Action

A ton of carbon emitted today causes immediate damage. Removing that ton five years from now doesn’t erase the harm done in the meantime.

Yet many carbon credits are sold for future projects — ones that haven’t even started.

When the climate crisis demands urgency, we can’t afford to delay action.

‍

5. The Risk of Greenwashing is Real

The feel-good stories — “we planted a million trees!” — are rampant. Without transparent reporting, auditing, and third-party validation, it’s hard to know when a positive impact really happened.

That gap between story and substance erodes trust (as our environment erodes–pun intended) between companies and the general public.

‍

So, where does that leave us?

We’re not here to criticize those who are doing their best with the tools available. Many people working in this space are sincere, thoughtful, and pursuing innovative climate solutions.

But at Ecodrive, we’ve decided to take a different approach.

‍

What do we do instead?

At Ecodrive, we support solutions that deliver immediate impact. Here’s what that looks like:

• Calculated results — Every action we support is traceable, timestamped, and verified with data you can see. No estimations, no vague promises.
  
  
• Direct environmental benefits — From reforestation to ocean plastic removal, our projects focus on outcomes that restore ecosystems and support communities.
  ‍
• Full transparency — We provide clear reporting and visual proof of impact, helping businesses build trust that every dollar spent contributes to lasting change and avoids greenwashing.
  ‍
• Climate action without delay — We prioritize initiatives that make a difference today, not five or ten years down the line.

‍

We are constantly looking at and evaluating the carbon credit market, and we are open to offering them, but only when we have the highest degree of confidence in their effectiveness.  

We hope to have a offering in our marketplace within the next 1-3 years as standards improve.

For now, we will keep creating impact in the best way we know how.

‍

--

‍

Interested in learning more? Check out some of our favorite articles and news sources on the subject!

1. PubMed article by Danick Trouwloo - Learn more about what carbon credits are and how corporate companies' climate claims lead to the risk of greenwashing.

2. Nature Communicators article by Gregory Trenchor - This study helps the Ecodrive team understand low quality offsets in the voluntary carbon market.

3. One Earth article by Ben Filewod - Understand carbon leakage and nature-based offset in the voluntary carbon market - a multilayered, often confusing concept.

4. Communications Earth and Environment article by Theresa Schaber - Read to learn about climate sensitivity (how sensitive the Earth's climate is to extra CO₂) and about the realistic impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies.

‍